I'm including stream_d results for IBM rs/6000 550 and 560.
The programs were compiled with xlf fortran v 2.2
xlf -O -P -Wp,-ea2478j stream_d.f
I used n = 1000000 but the results varied by more then 10%
between the runs.
In any case the results on the 550 were superior to the
results I found in your table for the 950.
regards
On the rs/6000 560:
--------------------------------------
Double precision appears to have 16 digits of accuracy
Assuming 8 bytes per DOUBLEPRECISION word
--------------------------------------
Timing calibration ; time = 44.9999988079071045 hundredths of a second
Increase the size of the arrays if this is <30 and your clock precision is =<1/100 second
---------------------------------------------------
Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
Assignment: 228.5716 .0731 .0700 .0800
Scaling : 228.5713 .0804 .0700 .0900
Summing : 240.0002 .1104 .1000 .1300
SAXPYing : 240.0002 .1082 .1000 .1200
on the rs/6000 - 550
--------------------------------------
Double precision appears to have 16 digits of accuracy
Assuming 8 bytes per DOUBLEPRECISION word
--------------------------------------
Timing calibration ; time = 50.9999971836805344 hundredths of a second
Increase the size of the arrays if this is <30 and your clock precision is =<1/100 second
---------------------------------------------------
Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
Assignment: 240.0002 .0724 .0600 .0800
Scaling : 240.0002 .0794 .0600 .0900
Summing : 196.3638 .1172 .1100 .1300
SAXPYing : 216.0002 .1146 .1000 .1400
-- Roberto Innocente SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati Via Beirut 4 - 34014 TRIESTE - Italy Phone +39-40-3787541 Fax +39-40-3787528 Internet: innocente@sissa.it Bitnet: innocent@ITSSISSA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 18 2000 - 05:23:02 CDT