Course Evaluations Tracker
|
COURSE: C S 588 SECT. 0001
TITLE: CRYPTOGRAPHY
SESSION: Fall, 2001
INSTR: EVANS DAVID
|
Frequency Count: 23
Expected Count: 37
Response Rate: 62%
|
# |
Item |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
TOT |
MEAN |
STD |
COURSE
|
1 |
How challenging
was the subject matter? |
17 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
4.773 |
0.429 |
2 |
How well were the
objectives of the course accomplished? |
12 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
4.455 |
0.671 |
3 |
How reasonable
was the required level of effort for the credit hours
received? |
5 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
22 |
3.318 |
1.249 |
4 |
How useful were
the homework assignments in helping you learn the
course subject matter? |
11 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
22 |
4.136 |
1.037 |
5 |
How helpful was
the textbook in increasing your understanding of the
material? |
0 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
2 |
21 |
2.524 |
0.873 |
INSTRUCTOR
|
6 |
How well was the
course material organized and developed? |
12 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
4.364 |
0.790 |
7 |
How knowledgeable
of the subject matter was the instructor? |
16 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
4.727 |
0.456 |
8 |
How prepared for
class was the instructor? |
18 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
4.818 |
0.395 |
9 |
How accessible
for individual assistance was the instructor?
(excluding Teaching Assistants)? |
13 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
4.409 |
0.796 |
10 |
How fair was the
grading policy? |
7 |
9 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
22 |
4.000 |
0.873 |
11 |
How adequate in
response to in-class questions was the
instructor? |
11 |
7 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
4.318 |
0.780 |
12 |
How
representative of the major points of the course were
the quizzes? |
4 |
9 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
21 |
3.762 |
0.831 |
13 |
How do you rate
this instructor as a teacher, relative to others in
this School? |
17 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
4.727 |
0.550 |
A=5=Well above
average B=4=Above average
C=3=Average D=2=Below average
E=1=Well below average |
|
|
Summary of Comments: Standard
Items |
|
Q1: |
Write any general comments in the space
below: |
Comment1.1 |
The
grader and undergraduate TA were extremely
unhelpful when a question was asked of
them. They seemed egotistical and
trivialized student concerns as if they
were obvious questions. Dave Evans, on
the other hand, was extremely approachable
and very willing to help students
understand the material better. He made
lectures entertaining, the class projects
were a great exercise, and I thoroughly
enjoyed the challenging nature of the
material. I wish I had never bought the
book. |
Comment1.2 |
I
had a great time taking your class. I will
definitely recommend it to others. Thanks!
|
Comment1.3 |
This course is very challenging, but
the material is so interesting and the
professor is so good, that Im glad I took
it. The level of commitment to the course
and the students that Prof. Evans shows, as
well as his knowledge of the subject, are
unparalleled.
A fine example of
Evans involvement in the course is the
class web page. Full of interesting links
to read, all the assignments and their
solutions, as well as links to material the
students have produced. Each days manifest
with a list of the days topics and
important questions to consider are also
posted on the site. Contrast this with
some other professors of mine who refues to
post documents on the toolkit page.
I believe Dave Evans has a bright
future at this University, all to this
schools benefit. As I overheard some other
students comment, in a few years, Dave will
be the Ken Elzinga of the e-school. He
realtes to his students very well, and is
very approachable.
More on the
course, I thought that the final projects
at the end required far too much work.
Especially considering that its due in the
closing weeks of the semester, immediately
after Thanksgiving break, the level of
coordination among 3-4 members was a bit
much.
I enjoyed the speakers that
Dave invited to attend our class. They
brought specific expertise and added
enthusiasm to the days they
attended.
I would recommend this
course to anyone at the school who wants to
learn, but is not afraid of lots of hard
work. |
Comment1.4 |
Great professor, like his creative
approach to teaching. |
Comment1.5 |
These online course evaluations are
terrible. Insecure and poorly thought out
and implemented. |
Comment1.6 |
This was a very good course. And
Dave is a very good teacher. |
Comment1.7 |
s
trs; rur p[rmomh v;sdd |
Comment1.8 |
Very good class, the best I ever
had, maybe. Even in other countries. But
the subject is very interesting so ... i
think everybody was captivated and motived
to work... |
Comment1.9 |
This is the best course I have taken
so far in college. I found it to be
consistantly challenging but never
overburdening. I would actually look
forward to doing the homework. The
professor made a subject that could have
been very dry interesting and
exciting. |
Comment1.10 |
The
class is very difficult, but Dave Evans is
probably one of the best teachers at this
school - and probably one of the smartest
too |
Comment1.11 |
no
comment |
Comment1.12 |
This is without question the best
class I have taken at this University. The
professor did a phenomenal job with the
organization and development of the
material. Problem Sets were at the same
time challenging and intriguing, enticing
the student to put forth extra effort to
gain a greater understanding of the
material. All course material was readily
and immediately available on the web site,
which was impeccably
maintained.
Dave, if youre reading
this, thanks so much for an incredible
class. I truly enjoyed it and learned an
unbelievable amount over the course of the
semester. |
Comment1.13 |
Prof. Evans is the finest professor
Ive had the pleasure of taking a class
with. He is extremely knowledgable about
his field of study and portrays this
information effectively. The class was a
lot of work, but I found it to be quite
interesting.
The presentation slides
were well done, and the web page was an
excellent way of communicating. I
especially like the articles relevant to
our course of study placed there. |
|
|
|